Domestic Violence Essay Example for Free

Domestic Violence Essay There are many theories out there that try to explain why domestic violence happens. Some like family violence theory say that it is passed down through the family because basically what you see is what you will do. Others say it’s a chemical imbalance or its based on other things. I believe that it is a little bit of all of the theories but the Culture of Violence Theory is playing a huge role today in helping shape our young children’s minds as to what is now acceptable. During this assignment we will look at four different types of examples of how the Culture of Violence Theory is doing just that. Culture of Violence theory claims that violence occurs at all levels of society and is looked at as a means to resolve a conflict. Violence and force are acceptable and are used even in family disputes. Theories believe that in order to stop a man from beating or hitting a woman then you have to change the way he believes or relies on violence being a means to solve all his problems. I also believe that our culture as a whole is violence driven. As a soldier in the United States Army, I deploy to combat areas and I have meet other new recruits who basically wanted to join the military for that reason. So then the question is why in the world would you want to do something just for the violence? Well we can look no further then what is the main culprit to me and that is the Mass Media. The Mass Media today is the main reason why our culture is so violence driven. First I am going to start off on the news media and movies that are being viewed by our children and young adults. The news media always seems to project negative things. You rarely hear anything about a city not having an violent acts being placed over the news. Instead you turn the news on and your going to see how a father came home and found his wife cheating on him so he beat her to death, then killed all his children before turning his gun on himself. The news always reports the violent acts so that’s what our culture is getting use to see. When we look at the type of movies being depicted that display acts of violence in a family household we look at the movie Precious. This movie won the actress a Grammy Award but in this movie your watching a girl being physically, verbally and sexually abused at home. The only time she was safe was at school. What does this type of information teach? It could teach a positive message but I believe that in reality all it did was downgrade women and especially African American women. Movies and the News aren’t the only means to project violence within our culture. The controversial video game by rock star called Grand Theft Auto has been sparking debates across the nation for years. This is one of the best selling franchises in the video game industry but the message in this top playing videogame for our youth in particular teens is violence. This game depicts family violence, drug selling, murder, extortion, robbery, theft, grand theft auto and many more violent crimes. This game really belittles women I feel because they always use derogatory language towards them. This game always shows â€Å"pimps† and ho’s† and the pimp is always beating on the women. This sends a message that our society is fine with this type of behavior since we generate it for our amusement and entertainment. I am one of those who is at fault by playing this type of games but I do understand that this is not appropriate for our youth because they are still learning and trying to understand what is the wrong and right way to act in society and this doesn’t help them in any way. Our society today is all about technology. Everyone has an internet capable phone and the internet is streaming videos constantly. With that being sad a lot of youth and teens are able to watch music videos either through their phone, laptop or on the television. The new hit song titled â€Å"Try† by Pink depicts two lovers basically having an all-out brawl with each other. They are pulling hair, breaking glasses, hitting each other. This music video shows our youth domestic violence but shows it as a poetry in motion or as just two people really in love with each other so even though they are hurting each other its ok as long as they continue to work it out and try again. So is the message here teaching our society to not harm each other? It doesn’t look that way to me and if this keeps up then we will continue to see the numbers as high as they are. All of the different examples I gave show you how our culture became so violence oriented. From the News stations to the Movies in the theaters to the videogames we buy our children and the music they listen to. What children hear and see is exactly what they will do so yes I believe Family Violence Theory plays a role in my paper but the Cultural Violence Theory is by far the most destructive force we have and we can only blame ourselves. Reference: CJ333 Chapter 3, Research and Theory on Family Violence Video Game Study Reinforces Negative Impact on Youth, Jennifer Leclaire, 4/10/06 Pink gets physical and aggressive in â€Å"Try† music video, Lucas Villa, October 10 2012

A Leader: Love and Hatred, Fear and Love Essay example -- Literary Ana

Many philosophers have discussed, written, and influenced the implementation of their ideas of the perfect qualities of a leader, and the techniques that one must use to improve and perfect their leadership abilities. Majority of these philosophers conclude that a leader must demonstrate favourable traits, which will in turn generate the public in which he is ruling over to love him. This will result in a successful leadership. These philosophies are also devised as if the real world was a perfect world. However, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a book, named, The Prince, which introduced the realistic idea that the world is not perfect and people do bad things. Because of this, leader must act differently to take charge of the naturally bad behaviour of the human race (The Prince 1). In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, there are numerous leaders who apply these ideas, and many who don’t. Although The Prince discusses many dark and relentless ideas of the perfect leader, his philo sophy is proven true by the characters from Shakespeare’s playwright, Julius Caesar, and the cause and effect of their actions. Brutus is a perfect example of a leader who did not follow Machiavelli’s advice, and did not succeed as a leader. For instance, Brutus’s main concern was pleasing the public and doing what was best for Rome. He did this by killing Julius Caesar (3.2.23-28). â€Å"If you want to acquire a reputation for generosity, therefore, you have to be ostentatiously lavish; and a prince acting in that fashion will soon squander all his resources, only to be forced in the end if he wants to maintain his reputation†¦to impose extortionate taxes.† (The Prince 2). Machiavelli stated that to be generous will have damaging effects on the leader. The damaging co... ...owed Machiavelli’s idea and as a result, killed anyone that was a threat to him (the conspirators). Machiavelli said that this was a good technique for a leader to use, because if a man does this, then everything that could possibly put him out of leadership is out of his way, leaving his leadership roll open to only him (Fears). Killing the conspirators was a great advantage to Antony because it gave him the opportunity to become a leader in the second triumvirate. Weather the characters of Shakespeare’s playwright, Julius Caesar followed or did not follow Machiavellian traits, each of the previous examples prove Machiavelli’s philosophy in The Prince true. Even though many philosophers conclude that a leader should have all positive traits such as kindness and generosity, a leader can be cruel and feared and be a better leader than one that is kind and loved.

Addiction to Junk Food Essay

Everyday, millions of people consume the so-called addictive â€Å"junk food. † Most of the people who do not have time, or find it affortable eat in fast food restourants such as McDonalds, Burger King, and many others. Junk food is addictive because of many reasons such as saving time. The junk food can be clasified in few categories – snacks, fast food, and soft drinks. First come the snacks, which are being brought everyday by millions of people who are not conserned about how unhealthy chips is and care only about how tasty it is. It is hardly possible to pass McDonalds nowadays without stopping there and having Hamburger Menu with a big Coke. The second category are the foods from the fats food restourants (example is McDonalds), such as, hamburgers. A person will buy a hamburger because it is very good in taste but he or she does not consider what really is inside this â€Å"meal† and how those ingridians might harm his or her health. Soft drinks are also a part of the junk food area. For example, Coke is being mentioned and associated with it are Fanta, Sprite and many other drinks without which people â€Å"cannot live. See more: Defining research problem and setting objectives Essay Soft drinks are incredibly bad for people’s health due to their high level of sugar and other components. In brief, all the mentioned examples of fast food and soft drinks should not be eaten by people; however, this works as a law, everything that people should not eat, they love and want and this is the addiction. In conclusion, it is normal to see a person nowadays walking around with a coke in one hand and a burger in the other. No matter how unhealthy this meal is, this person likes it so he or she assumes that there is no reason to throw this meal away, and this is the so called addiction with junk food.

What Is Womens History - A Short Overview

In what way is womens history distinct from the broader study of history? Why study womens history and not just history? Are the techniques of womens history any different from the techniques of all historians? How Did the Study of Womens History Begin? The discipline called womens history began formally in the 1970s, when  the feminist wave  led some to notice that womens perspective and earlier feminist movements were largely left out of the history books. While some writers had presented history from a womans perspective and criticized standard histories for leaving women out, this new wave of feminist historians were more organized. These historians, mostly women, began to offer courses and lectures that highlighted what history looked like when a womans perspective was included. Gerda Lerner is considered one of the major pioneers of the field, and Elizabeth Fox-Genovese  founded the first womens studies department,  for instance. These historians asked questions like What were women doing? in various periods of history. As they uncovered a  nearly-forgotten history of womens struggles for equality and freedom, they realized that  short lectures and single courses would not be adequate. Most of the scholars were surprised at the amounts of material that were, indeed, available. And so the fields of womens studies and womens history were founded, to seriously study not only the history and issues of women, but to make those resources and conclusions more widely available so that historians would have a more complete picture to work from. Sources for Womens History The pioneers of the womens history wave uncovered some important sources, but they also realized that other sources were lost or unavailable. Because at most times in history womens roles were not in the public realm, their contributions often didnt make it into the historical records. This loss is, in many cases, permanent. For instance, we dont even know the names of the wives of many of the early kings in British history because nobody thought to record or preserve those names. Its not likely well find them later, though there are occasional surprises. To study womens history, a student has to  deal with this lack of sources. That means that historians taking womens roles seriously must be creative. The official documents and older history books often dont include much of whats needed to understand what women were doing in a period of history. Instead, in womens history, we supplement those official documents with more personal items, like journals and diaries and letters, and other ways that womens stories were preserved. Sometimes women wrote for journals and magazines, too, though the material may not have been collected as rigorously as writings by men have. The middle school and high school student of history can usually find appropriate resources analyzing different periods of history as good source materials to answer common historical questions. But because womens history has not been studied as widely, even the middle or high school student may have to do the kinds of research usually found in college history classes, finding more detailed sources that illustrate the point, and forming conclusions from them. As an example, if a student is trying to discover what a soldiers life was like during the American Civil War, there are many books that address that directly. But the student who wants to know what a womans life was like during the American Civil War may have to dig a bit deeper. She or he may have to read through some diaries of women who stayed at home during the war, or find the rare autobiographies of nurses,  spies, or even women who fought as soldiers dressed as men. Fortunately, since the 1970s, much more has been written on womens history, and so the material that a student can consult is increasing. Earlier Documenting of Womens History In uncovering womens history, many of todays students have come to another important conclusion: the 1970s may have been the beginning of the formal study of womens history, but the topic was hardly new. And many women had been historians—of women and of more general history. Anna Comnena is considered the first woman to write a book of history. For centuries, there  had  been books written that analyzed womens contributions to history. Most had gathered dust in libraries or had been tossed out in the years in between. But there are some fascinating earlier sources that cover topics in womens history surprisingly astutely. Margaret Fullers  Woman in the Nineteenth Century  is one such piece. A writer less known today is Anna Garlin Spencer, although she enjoyed more fame in her own lifetime. She was known as a founder of the social work profession for her work at what became the Columbia School of Social Work. She was also recognized for her work for racial justice, womens rights, childrens rights, peace, and other issues of her day. An example of womens history before the discipline was invented is her essay, The Social Use of the Post-Graduate Mother. In this essay, Spencer analyzes the role of women who, after theyve had their children, are sometimes considered by cultures to have outlived their usefulness. The essay may be a bit difficult to read because some of her references are not as well known to us today, and because her writing is a style current nearly a hundred years ago, and sounds somewhat alien to our ears. But many ideas in the essay are quite modern. For instance, current research on the witch crazes of Europe and America also looks at issues of womens history: why was it that most of the victims of the witchhunts were women? And often women who didnt have male protectors in their families? Spencer speculates on just that question, with answers much like those in todays womens history. In the earlier 20th century, historian Mary Ritter Beard was among those who explored the role of women in history. Womens History Methodology: Assumptions What we call womens history is an approach to the study of history. It is based on the idea that history, as it is usually studied and written, largely ignores women and womens contributions. Womens history assumes that ignoring women and womens contributions leaves out important parts of the full story. Without looking at the women and their contributions, history is not complete. Writing women back into history means gaining a fuller understanding. A purpose of many historians, since the time of the first known historian, Herodotus, has been to shed light on the present and the future by telling about the past. Historians have had as an explicit goal to tell an objective truth—truth as it might be seen by an objective, or unbiased, observer. But is objective history possible? Thats a question those studying womens history have been asking loudly. Their answer, first, was that no, every history and historians make selections, and most have left out the perspective of women. Women who played an active role in the public events were often forgotten quickly, and the less obvious roles women played behind the scenes or in private life are not easily studied. Behind every great man theres a woman, an old saying goes. If there is a woman behind—or working against—a great man, do we truly understand even that great man and his contributions, if the woman is ignored or forgotten? In the field of womens history, the conclusion has been that no history can be truly objective. Histories are written by real people with their real biases and imperfections, and their histories are full of conscious and unconscious errors. The assumptions historians make shape what evidence they look for, and therefore what evidence they find. If historians do not assume that women are part of history, then the historians wont even be looking for evidence of womens role. Does that mean that womens history is biased, because it, too, has assumptions about womens role? And that regular history is, on the other hand, objective? From the perspective of womens history, the answer is no. All historians and all histories are biased. Being conscious of that bias, and working to uncover and acknowledge our biases, is the first step towards more objectivity, even if full objectivity is not possible. Womens history, in questioning whether histories have been complete without paying attention to the women, is also trying to find a truth. Womens history, essentially, values searching for more of the whole truth over maintaining illusions that we already have found it. So, finally, another important assumption of womens history is that its important to do womens history. Retrieving new evidence, examining old evidence from the perspective of the women, looking even for what lack of evidence might speak of in its silence—these are all important ways to fill in the rest of the story.